


But I also think we have to separate empathy and sadness from analysis of the factual and legal events. And there needs to be LOTS of good analysis in order to be sure there's better and quicker results next time, wherever it's needed.
And our empathy maybe made us not realize (or forget) that governmental responses are set up by law. (Maybe that's the first thing that should be changed?) As it is now, relief must occur at the smallest (village/city) level and work up to state and then federal level unless requests are specifically made to the next higher entity. Governors are forbidden by law from intervening until a town/city requests assistance and federal intervention is illegal unless requested by a state. That's why some governors declare "federal states of emergency" so quickly; it's not that they're alarmists, it's a legally required formality for obtaining federal assistance.
So I guess, to me, it's factual to say that the mayor of New Orleans and the governor of Louisiana waited way too long (because the mayor put off using the school buses and it was Wednesday before the governor requested federal troops) and therefore failed their citizens.
< home >


I agree that things were awful in NO but the reasons seem to be so many peoples' responsibility (don't forget the levee board members are under indictment for their own shenanigans!).
About words, what neutral words would you use? I thought wait and fail were simply descriptive of "time passing" and "not working" but what would you substitute if you wanted to be non political? I seriously would like my own language to be as neutral as possible unless I want it to be otherwise, so I'm really asking.
< home >
< home >