Monday, January 31, 2005
Iraq election redux
Amir Taheri, an Iranian writer and commentator has an article in today's Times of London in which he praises the "brave voters of Iraq" who "defied the terrorists and proved the doom-sayers wrong". He should have appended "in America and throughout the world" to that sentence. It is truly astonishing and more than worth a nod of respect to the millions of Iraqis - the approximately 70% of them! - who risked a lot more than half an hour's time, as we generally do - to vote. Their ballot was extraordinarily complex and the danger potentially fatal, but they did it anyway. Taheri closes his piece by pointing out that now, after the last half century of brutality (at worst) and doctrinaire totalitarianism (at best (if that can be ever said to be 'at best')), "battles will be fought inside the debating chambers of the assembly, on the campaign stump for a constitutional referendum, and then a new parliament to be elected before the end of this year." The doom-sayers were wrong, the optimists (and the auptimist) were right: "[t]he ballot box won’t lead to the coffin; it is the cradle of a new Iraq."

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:37 PM

Sunday, January 30, 2005
FDR
Happy 123rd birthday to Franklin Delano Roosevelt! For some information, articles, books, relevant links, etc., go to the FDR page on americanpresident.org. For much much more, visit the FDR Library website. And put a visit to the physical Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum in Hyde Park, New York (Dutchess County, not Long Island) with its wonderful museum, house and library on your "great places to go" list. By the way, from a social history perspective, it's amusing to note that this honored and respected president and first lady had five children who had nineteen marriages (Anna 3, James 4, Elliot 5, FDR Jr 5, John 2). I guess that's just another tiny piece of data for someone's thesis on character, parenting and public officers -- possibly completely irrelevant, possibly a clue to something that someone terribly clever has yet to identify. Anyway, FDR and Eleanor were fascinating, complex, multi-layered people. And the FDR Library is celebrating today's birthday with a luncheon and birthday cake for all visitors!

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:32 AM

Roy-Hart '65 Reunion
Check out the colorful and easy-to-navigate Royalton Hartland Central School (a/k/a Roy-Hart) class of 1965 reunion website. It's a paradigm of a terrific way to showcase info and photos for a high school reunion. Truth-in-advertising requires me to mention that its webmaster is a neighbor and good friend, but it really is a super site. It's fun to visit even if you don't know anyone in the class. Almost makes you want to be from Gasport, New York.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:04 AM

Saturday, January 29, 2005
Voting
As a child, I felt miserable when I realized how badly we treated some of our citizens, not allowing them to vote, and I was thrilled as that changed. I was also very upset about how hard-won that change turned out to be, and how recently all of us had earned the ability to become citizens. The good news is that we moved forward in the next decades, so much so that some young people don't know and are startled to hear what it was like.

I suppose the planet's every blogger and columnist (what, exactly, is the difference?) will write something on voting in the next few days because of the Iraq elections but it will be hard to find or write a more compelling and stirring piece than Kathleen Parker's. She begins by pointing out that "Like most Americans, I've never had to be brave to vote. I just show up at the polls, negotiate the ballot, grab an "I voted" sticker and drive home satisfied that the world will continue to turn on its axis in the usual way." She reminds us that it was "only after numerous acts of violence and, yes, terrorism against blacks that the 1965 Voting Rights Act passed."

With that in mind, Parker adds what could have been a platitude, although platitudes become familiar partly because they are so deeply true. She says that "Justice is not always swift, nor is the march to freedom easy. Democracy, as we seem to relearn each election season, is hard, messy work. So that witnessing the birth of democracy in Iraq, counting the painful contractions from afar, is both breathtaking and awesome." How right she is. Then she adds two paragraphs that say it all:
"Whether or not one agrees with the war that brought Iraq to this point, no American can watch these proceedings without wonder and respect. We've been there. We've had our own revolutions and our own demons to pursue. More than anyone else on the planet, we should be cheering them on. I don't know how those Iraqi men and women, some of whom reportedly have sworn a last will and testament in preparation to vote, will make the trek from their homes to the polls. Just as I don't know how those marchers in Selma made it across the bridge with their heads split and their shirts bloody.... But they did. Here's hoping Iraqis will, too."
Amen.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 8:26 AM

Thursday, January 27, 2005
Don't miss this
Michelle Malkin pointed out an online exhibit at the Library of Congress website that is absolutely a must-see. It's called the September 11, 2001, Documentary Project and is organized by the American Folklife Center which called upon the nation’s folklorists and ethnographers to collect, record, and document America’s reaction to the events of 9/11/01. The description of the collection says that it "captures the voices of a diverse ethnic, socioeconomic, and political cross-section of America during trying times and serves as a historical and cultural resource for future generations." Especially be sure to see the gallery of drawings by 14 Knoxville, Tennessee third-graders.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:27 AM

Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Give me a break
Maybe a bunch of aliens crept out of Ted Turner's television sets and invaded his head. That sounds silly, I know, but it would explain the venom he spewed yesterday at Fox News (see story, here). It's tempting and would be simplest to dismiss his rantings as another bout of gratuitous foolishness but it was so over the top that I feel compelled to say something. I'm not an uncritical fan of either CNN or Fox, for different reasons, but I cannot believe anyone thinks a television network can destroy or even significantly effect the social order. Television is a hugely important part of our lives, for sure, but that's not the same thing as removing our brains and replacing our thoughts. I bet some of both networks' viewers know how to read and write and everything. Maybe even decide what makes sense to them and what doesn't, what they believe or don't. Isn't tv just one piece of a great big collection of lots of different places from which we get information? Trust some sometimes, dismiss some sometimes, hate some, switch around, ignore them all, whatever? Turner should do deep breathing exercises or something.... OK, I'm done. I had to say something.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:51 PM

Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Literary blogs
C-Span held a discussion about literary blogs in December and they re-broadcast it over the (snowy) weekend. Held semi prisoner in my comfy living room, I found myself watching it with great interest. The panelists were Dennis Loy Johnson (MobyLives.com), Maud Newton (MaudNewton.com), Michael Orthofer (Complete-Review.com), Laila Lalami (MoorishGirl.com), Ron Hogan (Beatrice.com) and George Murray (Bookninja.com). It was a lively discussion that reminded me why I've been passionate about writing most of my life. Literary weblogs seem to be an interesting uptodate literary subgenre, some of which are highlighted here and some others of which are listed here. I haven't had a chance to peruse and familiarize myself with all the sites mentioned but so far I particularly like bookslut (at least half because of its name, needless to say) and the reading experience. Until now I was more immersed in political and craft blogs. All by themselves, they have won me over to the form. Now I want to explore another subject matter. To be continued....

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 11:19 PM

Sunday, January 23, 2005
The white stuff
and
I thought WE had a lot of snow but Boston looks like something out of a book. Amazingly beautiful but probably not fun to have to deal with.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 8:22 PM

Scarf

Gorgeous looking and feeling yarn from Morehouse Farm in Milan, New York near Red Hook. I bought it as a kit with yarn and a pattern that looked really great with two colors intertwining like houndstooth, but it completely flummoxed me (which is painful for me to admit). But then - as I mentioned on January 12th - my train friend showed me an Irish hiking scarf pattern and it seemed perfect for this warn. The photo doesn't convey how great it feels but it shows how nicely it came out at least. The reason for two pictures is that I took them with my LG6000 camera phone which, as if it wasn't already fabulous enough, has new tools for customizing exposure, color saturation, etc. I could only get a pretty bad shot of the scarf (see leftmost image above) because it's a bit dark itself and I was photographing late in the day on a fairly dark background in low light. But! tada! once even a pretty lousy photo gets on the pc, there's Picasa2 and/or Microsoft Office Picture Manager to the rescue to take the image anywhere from merely okay to terrific. Not to mention to tweak it to a regularly nice photo like the middle image or, better yet, apply fancy schmancy focuses and get a result like the one on the right. Cool, huh?

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 2:54 PM

Thursday, January 20, 2005
[March 4] January 20
Happy inauguration day! No matter who had our support in the election, today is a day to reflect on the fact that we have elections and can live our lives expressively and openly. Little girls with no shoes can grow up to be fabulously successful singers, little boys in abusive households can grow up to be president, Austrian immigrants can marry famous women and become governors, rich daughters of famous fathers can marry unknown men and become housewives, well-educated people can choose to do construction, children of seamstresses can become college deans. On and on, trillions of words would have to be written to encompass all the variations on this theme, the point being that Inauguration Day is a good occasion to acknowledge that this is an amazing country and that we're lucky and blessed to be here.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:11 AM

Snow treat
Michelle Malkin reported from a snow day yesterday and shared what sounds like a delicious recipe. I myself am soon to be meteorologically gifted with an opportunity to try this, so I thought I'd pay homage and include her recipe for "snow ice cream":
Large bowl full of fresh, clean snow
1 cup of whole milk
1/2 tsp. of vanilla extract
1/2 cup of sugar
Mix milk, vanilla, and sugar until dissolved. Add to snow, stir until consistency is thick and creamy. Serve immediately.
(I'll let you know if it tastes as good as it sounds.) Update: It does! It's great! Do it!!

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:05 AM

Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Acadia National Park
Today is the 76th anniversary of the opening of Acadia National Park. It's a fascinating place with many nature activities and views that are beyond stunning, such as this. I can't recommend Acadia strongly enough, and must add that it's logarithmically more beautiful in person than any image displays. Plus, the whole area has an atmosphere that melts stress and nourishes joy as if by magic.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:10 PM

Tuesday, January 18, 2005
Virginia Mayo
She was gorgeous and funny, a fabulous ingenue, femme fatale and even musical commedienne. Read about her here.

Labels: , ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:51 PM

Monday, January 17, 2005
MLK
"What is needed is a realization that power without love is reckless and abusive, and love without power is sentimental and anemic. Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice, and justice at its best is power correcting everything that stands against love....

Let us remember that there is a creative force in this universe, working to pull down the gigantic mountains of evil, a power that is able to make a way out of no way and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. Let us realize the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.”
--Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.,
in “Where Do We Go From Here?”, 1967

Labels: , ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:20 AM

Sunday, January 16, 2005
Elizabeth Janeway & Beatrice Wood
Some wonderful women live long spirited and inspiring lives. When they leave, it's sad but also an occasion for remarking on their contributions. Apparently Elizabeth Janeway died yesterday. In 1974 (in Between Myth and Morning), she wrote of the merely numerical construct that age is for some: "I have a problem about being nearly sixty: I keep waking up in the morning and thinking I'm thirty-one."

I'm reminded of Beatrice Wood, a delightful and quirky ceramacist who was 105 when she died in 1998, and had been a good friend of both Krishnamurti and Duchamps. In her biography, I Shock Myself, written at 96, she conveyed extraordinary joy and excitement of spirit, recounting many joys of getting older. From Janeway's and Wood's mouths to our ears!!

Labels: , ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 3:41 PM

Saturday, January 15, 2005
It can be good to disagree
In following up her discussion of the vituperative reaction that some emailers have had to her and Margaret Cho, among others, Michelle Malkin quotes a Thomas Sowell column which says some things about disagreement with which I thoroughly concur and therefore must reprint and annotate.

Although some people pay lip service to the idea of intellectual discourse, they become queasy about disturbing anyone and about loud voices that sound like arguing or "making a scene". Everyone chants the adage about getting more with honey than vinegar like a societal mantra. "Don't yell" and "calm down" are hastily uttered as soon as anyone is enthusiastic or excited about a point of view. Here is the central point:
"Disagreements are inevitable whenever there are human beings but we seem to be in an era when the art of disagreeing is vanishing. That is a huge loss because out of disagreements have often come deeper understandings than either side had before confronting each other's arguments."
I yearn for lively discussion, including disagreement, within a context of going toward deeper understanding. Arguments need not be the end of civility nor sever something important between them. And I noticed sometime in the last few years, particularly during the election campaign last fall, what Dr. Sowell points out, that
"[t]oo many people today act as if no one can honestly disagree with them. If you have a difference of opinion with them, you are considered to be not merely in error but in sin. You are a racist, a homophobe or whatever the villain of the day happens to be."
Quite the contrary. Read what Dr. Sowell says about an important disagreement he had with a friend and keep in mind that Dr. Sowell is, himself, black:
"Rational disagreement can be not only useful but stimulating. Many years ago, when my friend and colleague Walter Williams and I worked on the same research project, he and I kept up a running debate on the reasons why blacks excelled in some sports and were virtually non-existent in others. Walter was convinced that the reasons were physical while I thought the reasons were social and economic. Walter would show me articles on physiology from scholarly journals, using them as explanations of why blacks had so many top basketball players and few, if any, swimming champions. We never settled that issue but it provided lively debates and we may both have learned something."
I very much look forward to lots of lively, constructive, exciting, rational, detailed disagreements. And the new insights and understandings that result.

Labels: , ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 8:50 AM

Friday, January 14, 2005
To blog or to slog
Here's a big surprise. Not. Neither political side is less grimy about paying for hidden advertising than the other.

We learned from the Wall Street Journal today that "Howard Dean's presidential campaign hired two Internet political "bloggers" as consultants so that they would say positive things about the former governor's campaign in their online journals." It seems that Zephyr Teachout (the Internet outreach head in Mr. Dean's campaign) announced the deed on her Web log (Zonkette), adding that "to be very clear, they never committed to supporting Dean for the payment - but it was very clearly, internally, our goal." Her linguistic clumsiness aside, it's an amazingly forthcoming admission. (For the record, she named the two consloggants (my word - do you like it?): Jerome Armstrong (MyDD) and Markos Moulitsas Zuniga (DailyKos).)

And we learned a few days ago that some doofus in the Bush administration paid Armstrong Williams to plug GBW's education policy.

I'm not sure if the salient point is that we - the viewing and listening public - should assume that everyone is a paid shil or (as the auptimist noted on Monday) that journalists and bloggers should square their intellectual shoulders and take responsibility for what they write, say and show.

Bloggers sometimes have had a bit of a superior attitude based on (supposedly) owing allegiance to no one and therefore putting forth independent thoughts. I'd like to think that news writers (tv, radio, newspapers, internet, etc.) tell actual events without bias or point of view, but that's silliness. And I'd like to think that bloggers are individuals whose biases and points of view are evident, clear and clean, but that's not true either (at least sometimes). Just as our medium is getting its sea legs, people reveal themselves to be human after all.

I have faith, perhaps idealistic and foolish, that bloggers will take a moral highground of sorts and commit to being not merely casual mainstream but substantively different and (dare we hope?) better. It's up to us to decide and choose to make sure our noses are - and stay - as clean as we think / say / hope they are.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 1 comment(s) | posted by jau at 5:08 PM

Thursday, January 13, 2005
Dumb joke for the new year
(Answer is at Jan. 1 location to hide it a little.)
What's an alternate definition for coffee?

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 4:31 PM

G, B & Mrs. B
I ask you. How bad can GW be if he includes these two in his family and on his website!?

Labels:

Permalink | 1 comment(s) | posted by jau at 11:08 AM

Wednesday, January 12, 2005
Thanks!
There are many knitters and crocheters on the train I take to work, now - a good subject for another day. Today I must pay homage to the writer of River Knits Mountain Purls because she found the perfect scarf pattern for me. I had told her only yesterday that I want to thank my energetic and kind snow-plowing neighbor because he always gets right out and makes my (and others') lives much easier whenever it snows. (I decided on a scarf because it's personal, but not too personal, lovely but not too effusive, etc., etc. But all the patterns I saw or thought about designing were a bit feminine or didn't work with the yarn I want to use or were too boring.) Anyway, this morning there she was with a pattern for the Irish hiking scarf on Hello Yarn (a very nice site, I might add) and it's perfect. Photo to follow as soon as it's done. Thank you, Thora. Thank you, Hello Yarn.

Labels:

Permalink | 1 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:26 PM

Monday, January 10, 2005
Reporting + emotional sturm und drang
Re: the report on the word processing foolishness in which CBS News engaged - Dick Thornburgh and Lou Boccardi states (p. 16): "Done accurately and fairly, investigative reporting serves a critical role in a free society. Done inaccurately, it can cause great harm." More to the point, it's been helping a whole heck of a lot to create an overcharged and foul atmosphere that we experience all the time and which pretty much poisoned the 2004 election. They could have helped keep the dialogue more or less on point, and it would have been just as important and intense, but much much less full of vitriol. I have to say that I think those who want the credit for being overseers must also accept the responsibility to contribute thoughtful verbalization and, thereby, a degree of rationality and calm.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:03 PM

Sunday, January 9, 2005
Why not just say no?
Look, if you don't like a book or a movie - or a singer - don't read, watch or listen!!! I cannot understand what the problem is with things like the newest freaking out, over Kid Rock appearing at one of the inaugural balls. It's not as if someone's holding your head and forcing headphones into your ears and cranking up the volume and making you listen for hours and hours. As Florida Cracker points, out, wisely, "this is how it is with our culture. God [well, sometimes], country and family are first, but there's plenty of room left over for rowdiness." Hey, I've got an idea. Don't go. That'll show them.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:54 AM

No more dieting!?
Interesting piece on "Sunday Morning" (CBS-TV) about not dieting. NOT about being unhealthy or unfit, but about not dieting to become a size 4 when you're actually healthy as a size 12 or 14. They mentioned two books in particular. One is Wendy Shanker's The Fat Girl's Guide to Life, which seems both funny and chattily helpful. The other, by Dr. Glenn Gaesser, Big Fat Lies, is scientific and quite serious in saying that we the anti-fat obsession may be harming more than helping. He says, for example, that doctors and we always assume that being fat/large means having fat in our arteries. BUT it turns out that "most of the studies that have looked at the relationship between body weight (or body fat) and atherosclerosis--via coronary angiography or by direct examination of artery disease at autopsy--find that fat people are no more likely to have clogged arteries than thin people. In some instances results entirely opposite...are observed." Among his particularly interesting observations are that overweight men and women who exercise regularly have a lower risk for premature death than thin men and women who do not exercise and that body fat is beneficial, depending on its location, and can protect against heart disease, diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Definitely a must-read for those of us who could be thin only by being sick (such as the month that I ate no more than 900 calories a day...and passed out almost every day). The morale is this: be healthy, be fit, however it works for you.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:13 AM

Saturday, January 8, 2005
Figures
Oh sure, Princeton and Smith do this now that it's too late for me.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 8:46 PM

Friday, January 7, 2005
On being anti anti American
An interesting article, well worth reading, appeared on San Francisco Gate, entitled 10 things to celebrate why I'm an anti-anti-American . Comments include the following paragraph but the whole thing is worth look at for its several important points.
"This country did have a history of slavery and racism continues to exist. There is much in our culture that is vulgar and decadent. But the critics are wrong about America, because they are missing the big picture. In their indignation over the sins of America, they ignore what is unique and good about American civilization."

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:40 AM

Wednesday, January 5, 2005
Good heart, but....
According to an NBC news item quoting The Associated Press, Richard Gere told a Palestinian news person, "Hi, I'm Richard Gere, and I'm speaking for the entire world. We're with you during this election time. It's really important: Get out and vote." Just for the record, Richard Gere doesn't speak for the entire world (see entry 3038 at Fresh Bilge) and, gee, isn't it kind of presumptious of him to say so without asking each (or at least a whole bunch) of us? I guess it's fair to say that most westerners support voting qua voting - as opposed to not voting - but (a) isn't that the issue in Iraq right now, duh? and (b) it's too bad he's insecure enough that he feels he has to make so much more of it than that. (Rats. Now I feel bad. I commend him for caring enough to be involved in ways other than writing holiday songs or screaming on tv magazine shows. And I realize that some people listen to celebrities just because they're who they are. But sometimes they kind of overblow their own importance, you know what I mean?)

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 11:04 AM

Tuesday, January 4, 2005
Can you answer this?
A question - truly I don't know the answer and I don't understand: what is it about George Bush that inspires rage? To me he seems normal and typically American, so much so that I don't understand what provokes such anger and passionate rage. (Is there 'cool unimpassioned rage'? Ah, well, I guess that's a topic for another day.). If it's his quintessential American-ness, then are they also enraged when they meet common ordinary Wisconsin or Kansas or Oregon residents? I doubt it. If it's his speech, is it because each of them speaks so perfectly and succinctly, always conveying the right straight-on meaning as well as nuance, that it's beyond their ability to conceive that he speaks less perfectly? I doubt it. If it's because he claims fealty to moral rectitude, do they feel they know what's right and wrong (differently from him) and/or believe there is no such thing (unlike him)? Again, I doubt it. So what is the problem??

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 1:09 PM

Buy it if you can!
The Knitting Pattern-a-Day calendar is awesome. I highly recommend it. Unfortunately it's out of print at the publisher and out of stock at most bookstores. One place I know of that still has some is calendars.com. Go get 'em!

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:42 AM

Monday, January 3, 2005
Finally!
It's refreshing to hear the Thai and Sri Lanka foreign ministers lauding the U.S. for its compassion and enormous contributions of all kinds. We give so much and so many people knock themselves out to come here so it's good to have the words match the reality. There goes God writing straight with crooked lines again.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:54 PM

Read 'em and weep
Probably every website in the sphere is including this, but it's a good read: the 40 worst quotations from 2004. Enjoy! and thanks to rwn.

Labels: , ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:06 AM

Sunday, January 2, 2005
Why read, indeed
Sometimes tv is derided for turning us into spongy idiots. But occasionally one happens upon moments like the 12/5/04 presentation by teacher and writer Mark Edmundson. The book he's touting is "Why Read" (Bloomsbury). He talked about his teaching methodology which is to teach students to get books to change them for the better rather than simply provide facts or be entertaining. He said he believes early reading should show students how things really are in the world. After one understands how the community is, what its values and principles are, reading can challenge how things are and/or show us what we want to do about things. I think that gives structured reasoning to my discomfort with my kids being assigned Sylvia Plath and King Lear in high school; aside from the plain emotional issue of age inappropriateness (to use an oh-so-au-courant term), it's putting the challenge before the mores.

He was impassioned and extraordinarily affirming. He sees literature as a guide to living and wants us to read books in such a way that they ask questions of us or, more accurately, get us to ask ourselves questions that perhaps we would otherwise not even notice. Great writing, he said, is at once controversial and inspiring. He seems provocative and challenging as well as uplifting. He seems oddly unwilling to shove students to his way of thinking. He SAYS the goal is to have them learn about the unique contribution and place THEY each occupy, through reading. Wow. Is that exciting or what?! (Hey, he also spoke highly of Jane Austen and Henry James, so how bad can he be?!) Do you suppose there really is a teacher out there who wants his students to think for themselves?? Can it be true?? I hope he doesn't just degenerate into "friendly teacher" and doesn't let students like me wind him around their clever little fingers. I would have been so thrilled (internally) at having a teacher who prodded me to think and work harder, to examine myself and ask hard questions.

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 9:08 PM

Feeding the hands that bite us
America is expected to be generous and to contribute huge amounts of money and human assistance to relief work around the world but then everyone freaks out if we urge democracy and open society on them. I'm puzzled about that because if a family member requested substantial financial assistance from other family members, he or she would assume they'd also be inviting suggestions, wouldn't they? If you gave someone a bunch of money, wouldn't you be dismayed if the receiver did something horrible with the money?

Labels: ,

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 5:03 PM

Saturday, January 1, 2005
Answer to 1/13 joke
Person who is coughed on.

Labels:

Permalink | 0 comment(s) | posted by jau at 10:04 AM